oil for war, war for oil

I already knew that the oil driven agriculture is unsustainable, using almost 10 calories of oil for every food calorie it produces, but now I found out -by reading the Economist of all rags- that our warfare apparatus is equally unsustainable. The thrifty British use 7 gallons of fuel to bring one gallon of the precious liquid to theater in Afghanistan. One can only wonder how much more the far-less-thrifty Americans use. Only three gallons more and we could grow Roundup-ready corn in the Afghan desert! Time to buy Monsanto stock!

Our esteemed military uses in excess of 1 million gallons of fuel per day in Afghanistan, and a similar amount in Iraq. At least that is what the Economist reports. In the very same article the Economist points out that modern warfare would be impossible without oil. War with oil in a war for oil.

No wonder then that our military leaders are looking into solar power! Something will be needed to keep all those generators going so our troops can stay warm in winter, and cool in summer.

Some more numbers while we are at it. An armored humvee apparently gets four miles to gallon, while the famed Abrams tank uses four gallons to the mile. Now here is a cash for clunkers program that would make a difference.

Or how about riding bicycles? The added benefit would be that a group of dispersed bikers make a far less appealing target than a humvee loaded with GI's and goodies. Killing a cyclist never makes the evening news and we all know how media hungry these modern terrorists are. Plus, our soldiers would get their much deserved workout patrolling the streets.

Although we are told on a nearly daily basis how our police officers learn from the anti-terrorist tactics developed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and so are able to make our streets safer, maybe it is time for some common sense (and a lot less petroleum waste). It is obvious that street violence is much easier to control by having police officers walk the beat. Everybody knows that cops in a car are easy to spot and even easier to avoid. Luckily our local gang members prefer to avoid police cars rather than resort to IED's -at least for now.

Patrolling neighborhoods by car (or humvee) is the most ineffective way to control street violence (to say nothing of the greenhouse gases produced).

Here is something America could learn. From Iraq we learn that the best way to control violence is to take guns and ammunition away. We all understand that and I guess nobody would complain if we violated the Iraqi's second amendment rights to carry arms. Oh, wait a minute, Iraqi's don't have second amendment rights!

From our inner cities we learn that the best way to control neighborhoods is to have people walk the streets.

Ergo, if we took the guns away in America, and we patrolled the streets in Iraq, we could have less violence in both places, and a lot less greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. Now there is an idea that has legs.